Controversy over Salman : A reply to Anshul's dilemma

Dear Anshul ( morph guru )
I think famous personalities or figures hold a moral responsibility towards the society which gives them such fame, money or power. So its their duty to show an attitude which inspires the fans. Take example of Michael Phelps. Recently he was banned for some time for taking bong in public. Few people criticize the decision declaring it as an attack on his personal right. But when he society makes him a popular figure, he owes him a decent and ideal behavior and such misconduct should not be accepted as it affects many followers. If he wants to do anything like that, he should make sure that people or their personal lives are not affected by it. Therefore Salman Khan should have shown sympathy towards the sufferers of the mishap at the shooting of VEER.

controversy dog salmaan,who is guilty for amber?

amber shooting of the movie VEER turned into a bad mood when the wall near the temple shattered.the blame games started soon and again it was asserted that celebrity Salmaan khan was the one to be hold responsible.Salmaan khan as a personality always had a bad boy tagg with him,may be it was the attitude towards media or the controversies with co actors,hit and run case or may it the black bug incident.

but today the bad boy was not the villian,he could not be hold responsible for the Amber Fort incident.the wall was weak and was in knowledge of the officials that it could never have susutain that kind of stress.while the shooting team was being pointed out for the incident,the gamers must know that the shooting was going on with proper permission.while the police head's are claiming that the party didn't not submitted the required money for more constaibles,then was it not the moral responsiblity of the officials that they convey them that permission may be denied if this payment is not made,to make sure that there are proper arrangements of secuirty rather than  larger money.

well it was just not the system,salmaan and shooting party who were at fault,the public that went nuts for just a look of the celebrity also was at fault.when there was renovation work in progress is this the responsiblity of the officials and the system only to take care of the things spread around?we point that salmaan and the system are irresponsible and inefficient,rather fact is it's the madness and irresponsible public that led to this incident.

well the verdict is a person and a system cannot always be at fault,sometimes they are right and correct but since "HUM NAHI SUDHERENGE AUR HUM KAHBI NAHI SUDHERENGE",is valid for the people of india too,so the blame game goes on.fault cannot be from one side only, there are always two sides of a coin.further the growth and prosperity of nation can happen if and only if we support the right cause,we cooperate for growth and also when we share the burden of blame when we are invloved in.

JAI HO JAI HO